Addition of nebulised lidocaine to prevent refractory bronchospasms in a patient receiving serial bronchoscopies
- Ryan Grell
- Anesthesiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Ryan Grell; ryangrell@gmail.com
Abstract
A patient in his 20s with a history of granulomatosis with polyangiitis required 15 bronchoscopies with dilations in 1 year due to bronchial fibrosis and secretions leading to worsening shortness of breath. During these bronchoscopies, the patient experienced increasingly severe bronchospasms refractory to conventional preventative and treatment methodologies leading to prolonged hypoxia, reintubations and ICU admissions. During his 8th to 15th bronchoscopies, nebulised lidocaine was added to the pretreatment regimen, which eliminated perioperative bronchospasms and allowed for the elimination of all other adjunctive preventative treatments. This case highlights the novel perioperative use of nebulised lidocaine, in combination with nebulised albuterol and intravenous hydrocortisone, to successfully prevent previously refractory bronchospasms in a patient undergoing a general anaesthetic.
Background
Perioperative bronchospasm is a common concern particularly in patients with reactive airway disease. Although there are numerous treatment options for bronchospasms, there are no current therapeutic guidelines or recommendations for the prevention of refractory perioperative bronchospasms. We present a case of a young patient with a history of granulomatosis with polyangiitis who underwent 15 bronchoscopies with balloon dilations over the course of 1 year. During these serial procedures, he developed increasingly severe and refractory bronchospasms which lead to multiple occurrences of prolonged hypoxaemia, reintubation and ICU admission. We present this case to highlight the paucity of guidelines regarding the prevention of refractory bronchospasm in susceptible patients and to encourage further research into the utility of nebulised lidocaine in their prevention.
Case presentation
A man in his 20s with a history of granulomatosis with polyangiitis presented to the preoperative area in preparation for his eighth bronchoscopy with bronchial dilations in the past 12 months due to recurrent bronchial stenosis and copious secretions causing severe shortness of breath (figures 1 and 2). At the time of presentation, the patient was medically managed on albuterol inhalers, albuterol/ipratropium and budesonide/formoterol nebulisers, 30 mg prednisone daily and avacopan. He had previously been treated with cyclophosphamide and rituximab. He had no other significant medical history. His surgical history was notable for a myringotomy with tympanostomy tubes as a child. As part of the preanesthetic evaluation, it was determined that during his most recent bronchoscopies, the patient experienced increasingly severe bronchospasms necessitating the usage of increasingly aggressive treatment strategies to facilitate their resolution.
Typical predilation critical stenosis of distal left mainstem bronchus.
Right bronchus intermedius occluded with secretions and necrotic debris.
His first four bronchoscopies and bronchial dilations were completed with preoperative stress dose of 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone and 3 mL 0.083% nebulised albuterol prior to the induction of general anaesthesia with an endotracheal tube using sevoflurane vapour as the primary anaesthetic. At the completion of the procedure, the patient was extubated while breathing spontaneously with an end-tidal concentration ranging between 2.0% and 2.5% sevoflurane. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted.
During the fifth procedure following the same anaesthetic plan, mild bronchospasms were noted intraoperatively and were successfully treated with albuterol puffs delivered via the endotracheal tube. More severe bronchospasms were noted during the sixth procedure necessitating the intraoperative administration of albuterol puffs, 1 mg/kg propofol and 1 µg/kg epinephrine prior to their resolution.
During the seventh procedure, the patient was again pretreated with nebulised albuterol and hydrocortisone in the preoperative area. After the induction of general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation, he was given 0.5 mg/kg ketamine and started on an infusion of 0.5 µg/min epinephrine in order to prevent bronchospasm. Intraoperatively, he experienced a severe bronchospasm necessitating the administration of two boluses of 1 µg/kg epinephrine. At the conclusion of the procedure, the patient was extubated while breathing spontaneously with an end-tidal concentration of 3% sevoflurane. Shortly after extubation, the patient’s tidal volumes decreased from around 500 mL to under 50 mL, his oxygen saturation fell from 100% to 85% and his lung sounds were very distant.
Two boluses of 1 mg/kg propofol and 1 µg/kg epinephrine were administered with poor effect. A decision was made to reintubate the patient to improve oxygenation and rule out any endotracheal or endobronchial mucus plugs. After successful endotracheal intubation, the patient’s oxygenation began to improve. Additional doses of 1 µg/kg epinephrine and five puffs of albuterol via the endotracheal tube were simultaneously administered, and the sevoflurane concentration was increased to 4%. With these changes, the tidal volumes normalised. The proceduralist completed a second bronchoscopy, a chest X-ray was taken and arterial blood gas was obtained. Bronchoscopy and chest X-ray were both unchanged from baseline, and arterial blood gas was notable only for mild hypercapnia (figure 3).
Baseline anteroposterior chest X-ray.
After extensive discussion with the proceduralist, a decision was made to extubate the patient while breathing spontaneously with an end-tidal concentration of 4% sevoflurane. The patient was uneventfully extubated and directly monitored by an anesthesiologist until he regained consciousness. He was then transferred to the post-anaesthesia care unit, where he was observed for an additional 90 min before being discharged home in stable condition.
The next morning the patient presented to the hospital with respiratory distress due to severe bronchospasm. He was intubated in the emergency department and transferred to the ICU where he was treated with albuterol, epinephrine and hydrocortisone. He responded well to the treatment regimen and was extubated the next morning. He was discharged home in stable condition 2 days later.
Approximately 2 months later, the patient reported with progressively worsening shortness of breath and was scheduled for his eighth bronchoscopy with endobronchial dilation. After extensively reviewing the literature for additional suggestions to prevent bronchospasm, we decided to administer 3 mL 0.083% nebulised albuterol followed by 5 mL nebulised 4% lidocaine and 100 mg hydrocortisone in the preoperative area. We intended to administer subcutaneous terbutaline and intravenous magnesium as well; however, both were on national backorder and tightly restricted by our pharmacy department. After the induction of general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation, he was again given 0.5 mg/kg ketamine and started on an infusion of 0.5 µg/min epinephrine. There were no intraoperative bronchospasms. The patient was extubated breathing spontaneously with an end-tidal concentration of 4% sevoflurane. He was closely monitored by an anesthesiologist until he regained consciousness and was transferred to the post-anaesthesia care unit. After a brief observational period, he was discharged in stable condition.
Over the next 6 months, the patient underwent a total of seven additional bronchoscopies with endobronchial dilations. Due to the remarkable difference in clinical status with the addition of nebulised lidocaine, we elected to reduce preoperative and intraoperative bronchospasm prevention by one medication with each subsequent procedure (first we decreased sevoflurane concentration to 2% at extubation, then we eliminated ketamine and then we eliminated the epinephrine infusion) until we were only pretreating the patient with 100 mg of stress dose hydrocortisone, 3 mL 0.083% nebulised albuterol and 5 mL nebulised 4% lidocaine. There were zero incidents of intraoperative or postoperative bronchospasms or hospital admissions with the subsequent procedures in this strategy.
Outcome and follow-up
Since his last bronchoscopy, the patient completed an intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab course, which had excellent results. It has now been 3 months since his last bronchoscopy. Prior to the intravenous immunoglobulin infusion, the longest duration since his initial diagnosis that he had without receiving a bronchial dilation was roughly 3 weeks. He made a full return to his office-based job and is fully independent. He has not experienced any further symptoms of shortness of breath at rest or with moderate activity, although he is still limited when he attempts to exercise. Given the risk-versus-benefit ratio of further bronchoscopies, the patient and the proceduralist have declined to pursue any additional intervention at this time.
Discussion
Bronchospasm, a vagally mediated reflex which severely constricts bronchial smooth muscle thereby limiting alveolar air flow and gas exchange, is a potentially life-threatening condition. Patients with certain comorbidities—asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis, chronic smoke exposure, current or recent upper respiratory infection, etc—are at higher risk of perioperative bronchospasm.1 2 Noxious stimuli, such as performing tracheal intubation at a light anaesthetic plane and the usage of desflurane vapour, can also increase the risk of bronchospasm.
Likely the best option for preventing perioperative bronchospasm is to use regional or neuraxial anaesthetics whenever possible and avoid usage of a general anaesthetic. In cases where a general anaesthetic cannot be avoided, the usage of a laryngeal mask airway has been shown to reduce the incidence of bronchospasm when compared with the usage of an endotracheal tube.1 2 It is also well described in the literature that inhaled β2 agonists, such as albuterol, and intravenous steroids, such as hydrocortisone, are the primary perioperative pharmacological therapies that should be considered for most patients who are at increased risk.
Other therapies such as intravenous ketamine, magnesium, terbutaline and epinephrine have been used as adjuncts for the prevention and/or treatment of refractory bronchospasm with varying efficacy; however, no guidelines currently exist for their usage in the perioperative setting.1 3 Similarly, despite its known ability to attenuate sensation and reflexes, no guidelines or societal recommendations exist for the usage of nebulised lidocaine to prevent bronchospasm. This is likely due to the fact that only limited data exists on the usage of nebulised lidocaine to prevent bronchospasm in patients with asthma; very little data exists on its usage in the perioperative setting; and even less data exists on patients without asthma.
In an open study, Hunt et al evaluated 20 adults with iatrogenic hypercortisolism due to high glucocorticoid requirements needed to treat severe asthma.4 By administering 40–160 mg of nebulised lidocaine four times per day, they were able to completely eliminate the oral glucocorticoid regimen in 13 of the 20 patients and reduce the daily requirements in an additional four patients while maintaining sufficient symptomatic control of their asthma.
Shortly after, Decco et al launched a pilot study on six children with severe glucocorticoid-dependent asthma where the complete elimination of steroids was achieved in five of the six patients with the usage of nebulized lidocaine three to four times per day.5
Hunt’s group then created a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of nebulised lidocaine in 50 adult patients with mild to moderate asthma. They found that patients treated with nebulised lidocaine had significantly improved FEV1, lower bronchodilator requirements and lower inflammatory mediators compared with patients treated with a placebo.6
In attempting to explain the mechanism behind this effect, Serra et al created a murine model of asthma where they sensitised two groups of mice with ovalbumin before exposing one group to nebulised lidocaine and the other to a control.7 Then both groups were challenged with aerosolised methacholine. After sacrificing the mice and examining histological slides, bronchoalveolar lavages, western blots and flow cytometry of the lungs, the authors found that the mice exposed to nebulised lidocaine had significantly lower bronchial hyperreactivity, inflammatory markers, mucus and collagen content, and subepithelial fibrosis compared with the control mice.
Finally, in order to investigate whether nebulised lidocaine had a synergistic effect with albuterol, the mainstay of asthma treatment, Harald et al launched a self-controlled study of 15 patients with asthma.8 They found that the dose of histamine needed to decrease FEV1 by 20% doubled when patients were pretreated with either nebulised albuterol or lidocaine when compared with control exposure. When nebulised albuterol and lidocaine were coadministered before histamine challenge, the amount of histamine needed to cause a 20% decrease in FEV1 more than quadrupled when compared with control exposure.
The administration of nebulised lidocaine is generally very safe; however, as with any medication, the risks and benefits must be considered carefully before selecting an appropriate dosage for each patient. In doing so, the risk of adverse reactions, ranging from circumoral numbness to seizures, can be minimised.6
Similar to the patients studied by the prior authors, our patient had profound improvements in his intraoperative course when pretreated with nebulised lidocaine. The mechanism of this improvement is likely multifactorial. As described by Serra et al and Siqueira et al, our patient likely benefitted from a decrease in bronchial hyperreactivity and inflammatory mediators as well as decreased propagation of reflex transmissions.7 9 Overall, this led to a stable anaesthetic course with no complications.
To our knowledge, the case presented in this report is the first where nebulised lidocaine in combination with nebulised albuterol and intravenous hydrocortisone has been used perioperatively to prevent previously refractory bronchospasms in a patient undergoing a general anaesthetic. The treatment was well tolerated by the patient and could serve as a safer and more effective alternative to other adjunct treatments when needed to prevent or treat refractory bronchospasms.
Learning points
-
Bronchospasms can be severe life-threatening events that are refractory to conventional treatment modalities.
-
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis can be associated with refractory bronchospasm.
-
Nebulised lidocaine may be a viable treatment adjunct to nebulised albuterol and intravenous hydrocortisone in preventing perioperative bronchospasm.
-
Care should be taken to select an appropriate dosage of nebulised lidocaine for each patient in order to minimise the risk of adverse reactions.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
RG would like to acknowledge his fellow anesthesiologists, resident physicians, CRNAs and respiratory therapists who have taken excellent care of this patient and followed our treatment pathway for him.
Footnotes
-
Contributors RG is the sole author of this manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer